Who are the first-movers?

Some of the biggest names in manufacturing have already begun piloting blockchain-based solutions, with billion-dollar firms such as Moog Aircraft Group piloting a solution for parts built with additive manufacturing.

Additive manufacturing: creating a physical object from a 3D digital design (e.g. 3D printing) for parts which are more durable, lighter and stronger.

Blockchain is used since manufacturing as a service (MaaS) is less a hardware production challenge than a records-management one. As such, this facilitates a need for new business models for how, when, and where products are manufactured. Businesses need to decide which network of supply chain assets and which mix of old and new processes will be optimal. High-value, high-risk manufacturing segments such as aerospace will likely make the shift sooner than later, bringing pilot schemes to reality. Moreover, the solution can be expanded to open ecosystems of supplier-consortiums.

Let’s take a look at how this would work in practice.

1. A UK business receives an order for 3D parts from a Chinese client. Due to location-specific advantages a parts producer in China wins the contract to supply the part.

   1. The business is part of a consortium blockchain platform from which its design for additive manufacturing (DfAM) is downloaded.

   2. The consortium’s blockchain platform represents neutrality, which creates trust and transparency that encourages supplier participation. 

2. For every individual download of the design, the rights owner of the intellectual property (the design) holder receives a royalty.

3. The IP rights’ owner is part of a supplier consortium which not only provides intellectual property protection, but also insurance and instantaneous recognition of revenues.

4. During the manufacturing of the parts, the identity of the operator and the machine is recorded to the blockchain, in addition to the fingerprint of the part’s grain structure during the manufacturing process.

5. The full lifecycle of the part, provenance, authentication, traceability, and secure data transport (data packages) is visible throughout the supply chain and can be verified by a QR code which comes on the part.

On the basis of the above steps, an on-demand parts network is formed.

Benefits of blockchain-based manufacturing

Implementation of a distributed ledger which utilises blockchain offers several advantages over existing, centralised systems. Centralised systems are vulnerable to human error, fraud and, amongst other pitfalls, loss of records. However, a blockchain-based solution is designed to provide:

• Provenance with authenticity traceability on a per part basis

• Complete history of the design-manufacture-use cycle per part (digital twin)

• Secure data transport through the digital path

• Digital rights management, licensable transactions

• Automation of processes through smart contracts

By combining the benefits that blockchain brings with other technologies such as the Internet of Things (IoT), machine learning and others, we end up with a complete data set about manufactured items. The value in this is massive, not only from a production point of view to understand where there are pain points and inefficiencies, but also on the consumer side, whereby consumers are all the more interested in learning about the product origins of the items they purchase.

So why isn’t blockchain underpinning the manufacturing industry right now?

Whilst research from Capgemini shows that manufacturers have the most at-scale implementation of blockchain at present (see above), the technology is still considered as immature. Right now, the high cost of blockchain implementation does not demonstrate a clear return on investment and, with blockchain being a nascent technology, many businesses are reluctant to integrate yet unproven and widely-accepted technology. The technology’s nascency is demonstrated by the small (6%) percentage of at-scale integration as shown in the Capgemini research.

However, according to the World Bank, manufacturing accounts for almost 17% of worldwide GDP, making it a key driver of the global economy. Meanwhile the cost of blockchain implementation pales before the market value for counterfeit goods and piracy, which is valued at over $1 trillion and forecasted to reach almost $3 trillion by 2022.

“Trust tax” solved

It becomes clear that, in addition to the creation of new business models and improvement of existing processes, blockchain’s usage in manufacturing has value in controlling and documenting events, with resulting increases in transparency. This would reduce the “trust tax” that is currently levied due to issues between transactions between many parties. Whilst blockchain is not implementable across all sectors of society, in industries such as manufacturing where there are multiple parties that rely on the veracity of the data they share and access, a decentralized and collaborative network is worth implementing.

About Peter Fedchenkov
Peter Fedchenkov is the co-founder of Insolar. Insolar is an open-source enterprise-grade blockchain platform to enable seamless interactions between companies and new growth opportunities powered by distributed trust.